Tag: elul

  • Is An Early Selichos Allowed?

    Is An Early Selichos Allowed?

    The Pre-Chatzos Gatherings

    Over my time in the rabbinate I’ve learned that there are a number of constants—occurrences so predictable that I often anticipate them long in advance. One of them is a complaint, or “suggestion,” that I always receive at this time of year.

    It involves the first night of Selichos on Motzaei Shabbos, which is traditionally recited after chatzos—around 1 a.m., not the most convenient time.

    It goes without saying that our goal is not to question other shuls, chalila. Rather, our purpose is to give chizuk to those who still attend a 1 a.m. selichos who have begun to wonder and question me if there is even still a point to continue doing so.

    Whether kitniyos on Pesach or standing for Kiddush, discussing the efficacy of changing to an other’s minhag would never be seen as disparaging to its true practitioners. Similarly here, there are those in certain cities, such as London, whose minhag is to recite an “early” Selichos, as well as certain communities as well, such as the chasidim of Gur and Vizhnitz. We would never question such practices.

    In speaking with older rabbanim, I have learned that the pressure for an earlier Selichos apparently began in earnest only in the past few decades. If one shul adopts this practice, there is automatically pressure on a neighboring shul, causing a ripple effect.

    So, why are so many rabbanim so insistent on this later time for this selichos?

    The Chofetz Chaim writes, “Before chatzos, we are not to say any Selichos or the Yud Gimmel Middos shel Rachamim, no matter the reason, except on Yom Kippur” (Mishnah Brurah, siman 565:12, quoting the Magen Avraham, se’if 5).

    There are four concerns about a pre-chatzos Selichos.

    First, the kedushah of Shabbos doesn’t end abruptly; instead, it fades gradually until chatzos. The Arizal, for instance, would not mourn the Churban after Shabbos until chatzos (see also Shaarei Teshuvah and Birkei Yosef on siman 581).

    Secondly, we all know that certain tefillos, such as Tachanun and Avinu Malkeinu, are omitted at certain times, such as at night, and on certain occasions, such as at shivah, and even on Yom Kippur if it falls on Shabbos. This is often due to an inappropriate mix—for example, not mingling the simchah of a chasan with the din of Tachanun,or not wanting to add the din of Tachanun to the din of night.

    In the latter case, such techinos are omitted until the period of din concludes, which is at chatzos (see siman 131, Mishnah Brurah, se’if 18, et al.). Selichos, and certainly the crescendo of the Yud Gimmel Middos shel Rachamim, are therefore not recited at night before chatzos, except on Yom Kippur (see shu”t Yechaveh Daas 1:46, where Rav Ovadia Yosef rules that one who happens upon a Motzaei Shabbos early minyan should not recite these tefillos with them).

    Thirdly, Selichos are intended to be recited during an eis ratzon.The Shulchan Aruch says that this is the last three hours of the night, but many move it back, beginning at chatzos (siman 581 with Magen Avraham). Indeed, historically, the first Selichos was said in the early hours of Sunday morning, leading into Shacharis.

    Although an eis ratzon can be created simply by convening a minyan in a beis haknesses (see Brachos 8 and Yevamos 49), during these days of din we want to take advantage of the natural eis ratzon that occurs in time (shu”t Igros Moshe, Orach Chaim 2:105). One need not be a historian to figure out that from time immemorial we have been reciting selichos on this night deep in the night, mostly hours before sunrise. One can simply peruse the language of the pizmonim and techinos of this first night of selichos: ‘b’zaakum b’oid leilah,’, ‘kumnu b’ashmuros’, etc..

     In fact, the Aruch HaShulchan rules that even those who recite this night’s selichos the next day (which is certainly allowed, if not the premier method for one who can not make a chatzos selichos or an early morning one) must skip those and similar statements (561:4).

    Although Rav Moshe Feinstein is often quoted as allowing an earlier Motzaei Shabbos Selichos, here is his exact language:

    [After an exhaustive review of this topic]

    ...“One may allow [an earlier Selichos] in a time of great need, where if they were to recite [Selichos] later, the whole matter will become nullified [no minyan will show up] and they will be deprived of the awakenings of teshuvah. But it must be publicized and made known that this is only a hora’as sha’ah [allowance for extraordinary circumstances] due to a great and unique need; that it is only for this year; and that next year Selichos will be recited in its proper time…”

    • Shu”t Igros Moshe, Orach Chaim 2:105

    This doesn’t read as a ringing endorsement. We should also note that this was written in 1959, certainly a shaas hadechak in America.

    Every rav will make the right decision for his shul. There are indeed many kiruv-oriented shuls, out-of-town kehillos, etc. who need to rely on this allowance.

    But for my shul, I can find no basis or source for an extra earlier minyan just so more people will come—especially because it will certainly diminish the powerful practice of “B’rov am hadras melech,” glorifying Hashem through a large crowd, at the chatzos minyan, and will, perhaps and in time, extinguish it completely.

    While a subject for another post, a rav allowing the breach of the ‘small’ so as to avoid a breach of the ‘big’ is summarily dismissed by the poskim and may also suffer from ‘reductio ad absurdum’. .

    Should a shul, say, offer breakfast before Shabbos morning davening?

    After all, this will certainly bring in more people for pesukei d’zimra -an actual Talmudic demand as opposed to the minhag of selichos – and one can find even more on which to rely when it comes to eating before davening!

    When I was learning in Eretz Yisrael, I recall people waking up excitedly at 2 a.m. to “catch the game” or some other matter of interest. We have all been so excited about something or other that we couldn’t sleep. Once a year, let’s show Hashem that we can summon, or attempt to summon, or just imitate these feelings for Him and for teshuvah.

    • I’d like to conclude our discussion of ‘inconvenient’ selichos with an excerpt from the diary of Max Lilienthal, written in the 1850s, when he served as a Reform rabbi in Cincinnati. Years earlier, Sergey Oborav, the Russian Minister of Education, had appointed Lilienthal as the liaison between the Czarist authorities and his Jewish compatriots. His task was to convince yeshivos to surrender their daily schedules to will and whims of the government. On his way to Volozhin, he stopped in Vilna. Reminiscing on that trip, he wrote the following:

    “…The following Sunday was the first day of Selichos service to commence at 4 a.m. I hurried into the streets, and what a strange spectacle presented itself to my eyes! An uncommon noise of loud steps arrested my attention, and emerging from all quarters I saw persons enveloped in immense white clothes, with a burning light before them, stepping and marching in all directions. I really thought that the resurrection of the dead had made its beginning…

    “I stood in silent expectation waiting for some of these strange manifestations to come nearer in order that I might be enabled to distinguish whether they were alive or specters. I soon found out that they were the pious ladies of Vilna, who hurried so early to the synagogues. Each of them was provided with a pair of wooden slippers, which made such an infernal noise on the pavement… The spectacle of thousands of women in the deep night, each carrying a burning lantern, made me feel that the whole city seemed to be roused and to form a ghostly procession. After having recovered from my astonishment, I went to the synagogue, which was filled well nigh to its utmost capacity…

    “During the Selichos days, the one hundred synagogues of Vilna were crowded to the utmost, and everybody prepared for the New Year service. Even the businessmen stayed in the morning a few hours longer in the batei hamidrash. In the evenings, the rich and the poor, the merchant and the tradesman, the aged and the youthful, assembled in the numerous places of worship to listen to the lectures of the maggidim, who were calling the attention of their faithful audience to the approaching day of judgment.

    “Though the schools had been closed since the beginning of Elul, the children did not run about the streets but visited the synagogues with their parents, as if the awe and reverence of those days of repentance had already taken hold of their innocent minds. Alms were richly bestowed upon the poor and needy, the benevolent institutions were well supplied, and every man seemed to be resolved upon amending his ways as far as he was able…” ●

  • Disaster Clean Up

    A Message for Rosh Hashanah

    September 2015

    I recently shared with my kehillah the following remarkable exchange released by the Reagan Presidential Library:



    April 18, 1984
    Dear Mr. President,
    My name is Andy Smith. I am a seventh-grade student at Irmo Middle School in Irmo, South Carolina.
    Today my mother declared my bedroom a disaster area. I would like to request federal funds to hire a crew to clean up my room. I am prepared to provide the initial funds if you will provide matching funds for this project.
    I know you will be fair when you consider my request. I will be awaiting your reply.
    Sincerely yours,
    Andy Smith
    400 London Pride Road
    Irmo, South Carolina 29063

    The president soon responded:

    May 11, 1984
    Dear Andy:
    I’m sorry to be so late in answering your letter but, as you know, I’ve been in China and found your letter here upon my return.
    Your application for disaster relief has been duly noted, but I must point out one technical problem. The authority declaring the disaster is supposed to make the request—in this case, your mother.
    However, setting that aside, I’ll have to point out the larger problem of available funds. This has been a year of disasters: 539 hurricanes as of May 4th and several more since, numerous floods, forest fires, a drought in Texas and a number of earthquakes. What I’m getting at is that funds are dangerously low.
    May I make a suggestion? This administration, believing that government has done many things that could be better done by volunteers at the local level, has sponsored a Private Sector Initiative Program, calling upon people to practice volunteerism in the solving of a number of local problems.
    Your situation appears to be a natural. I’m sure your mother was fully justified in proclaiming your room a disaster. Therefore, you are in an excellent position to launch another volunteer program to go along with the more than 3,000 already under way in our nation. Congratulations.
    Give my best regards to your mother.
    Sincerely,
    Ronald Reagan

    A humorous exchange, it also serves as a perfect analogy for the period in which we find ourselves.

    At this time of year I always think back to how messy my room was when I was a child. Every Tuesday I would be told to clean up my room, the bathroom, the playroom. When I asked my mother why she was extra-strict about clean-up on Tuesdays, she explained, “Because the cleaning lady is coming.”

    This made absolutely no sense to me. Clean up because the cleaning lady is coming? But when I got older, I understood that it is demeaning to leave someone else to deal with a pig sty. Workers are human beings, and this is not how we treat people.

    Similarly, lahavdil, we have a promise that Hashem is going to help clean up our mess—“Itzumo shel Yom Hakippurim mechaper, the awesomeness of the day atones (for us).” But we first need to clean ourselves up as best we can and not “leave” the entire job for Hashem.

    When I read this correspondence between Andy Smith and President Reagan, I was reminded, l’havdil, of the midrash on Eichah that speaks of a similar exchange between klal Yisrael and the Ribbono Shel Olam regarding teshuvah (Eichah Rabbah 5:25).

    The penultimate pasuk of Eichah, recited aloud by the kehillah, reads, “Hashiveinu Hashem eilecha v’nashuvah, bring us back, Hashem, and we will thereby be returned.” The midrash says that Hashem responds by assigning us the responsibility of taking the first step: “Shuvu eilai v’ashuvah aleichem, you must (first) return to Me, and only then will I return to you” (Malachi 3:7).

    This midrash explains that there is an ongoing “quarrel” in which klal Yisrael asks Hashem to take responsibility for coming toward us first, and He responds that we must initiate our own return before He comes toward us.

    Who wins this debate? Who is ultimately charged with beginning the clean-up?

    It would seem at first that klal Yisrael triumphs, because the midrash ends by quoting a pasuk in Tehillim (85:5) supporting our request that Hashem take the initiative.

    But perhaps during Elul, this changes. As we know, the Mishnah Brurah notes (in the name of many others) that Elul is an acronym standing for “Ani l’dodi v’dodi li.” This is not just a nice idea but reflects the fact that ultimately, we must take the first step—“ani l’dodi”—and only then “v’dodi li,” Hashem will assist us.

    Just how far must we go before Hashem assists us?

    Rav Yerucham Olshin cites an amazing idea explained by Rav Isser Zalman Meltzer (Yerach L’moadim 1, p. 235). The Torah teaches that Bisyah, Pharaoh’s daughter, saw Moshe in a basket in the river, “vatishlach es amasah, and she sent her handmaid (to get it)”(Shemos 2:5). Rashi says that amasah refers to her arm, which miraculously stretched far enough that she was able to take hold of the basket.

    Rav Isser Zalman wonders why Bisyah reached out in the first place if the basket was beyond her reach. He says this teaches us that a person must make every effort to do the right thing, no matter how impossible it seems, and Hashem will take care of the rest.

    Just a few Shabbosos ago, thousands of frum families in Florida were displaced when Hurricane Irma barreled in. They took responsibility for their lives by fleeing. And then the Jewish people came through. In the city of Atlanta alone, more than a thousand families were hosted for that Shabbos.

    Hashem will always help us figure it out. The “dodi li”will always come—if we first do our part.

    We live in a challenging era. It is harder than ever to grow in our avodas Hashem. How can we promise that we will change when we know the power of nisayon? As Bisyah did, we are asked to do something—at the very least, to take the first step.

    It is said that Rav Shneur Kotler once accepted a halfhearted apology from someone who had behaved brazenly toward him in public. His shocked students asked, “But Rebbe, look what he did!” Rav Shneur explained that when someone takes the first step and apologizes, even if he is not fully sincere, it should be enough for us to complete the rest.

    The Gemara teaches that anyone who says, “Ashuv va’echteh, ashuv va’echteh, I will sin and repent, and again sin and repent,” is not allowed to repent. I saw a beautiful chasidishe pshat on this that translates the phrase differently. Sometimes a person thinks, “Every year I say I will do teshuvah, and then after the Yomim Tovim I sin again, so what’s the point?” A person like this will not be granted teshuvah since one who questions his potential can’t grow.

    All Hashem asks is that we take the first step in our return and “clean up” a little.

    May Hashem respond to our efforts a thousandfold and grant all of our tefillos. Wishing everyone a chasimah vachasimah tovah!