Category: In Memoriam

  • Another Sefira Secret

    Why Did Only Rebbe Akiva’s Yeshiva Suffer from Sinas Chinam Issues?

    Something happened over Shavuos. Should I tell you about it? Although the yom tov has already passed, I think I will.

      One of the more challenging elements of writing a weekly column is that one must write about the yom tov before it arrives. However, once that yom tov issue already arrives on store shelves and in people’s mailboxes, invariably over that given yom tov sudden stories develop, intriguing events unfold, and curious happenings take place. So often, by the time the next year comes around those stories are long forgotten. For this reason, I am always challenged if I should share stories from yom tov in the post yom tov issue.

    But Shavuos may be different. Nesinas hatorah can never be bound by time, and for this reason, explain many, does the Torah never itself refer to this day as yom matan toroseinu; for Torah is given, or ready to be received, daily. Perhaps this gives us the allowance to talk about Shavuos still after its days have passed.

    I was walking home from shul on yom tov when someone approached me with a question. It was such a simple question, but like many seemingly basic inquiries, it was one that was also so profound.

    We know that the days of sefira not only count toward shavuos, but also remind us of the deaths of 24,000 students of Rebbe Akiva due to their not treating each other with proper respect. While this certainly reminds us that the Torah is not simply a book of laws to be studied but a way of life to be lived, there was something that had been bothering him about these events.

    There were many yeshivos in the day of Rebbe Akiva, so why is it that only his yeshiva suffered from this deficiency? Why don’t we find this problem in the other yeshivos of the time? What was it about this yeshiva in particular that caused this sickness?

    This is one of those questions that seem so simplistic at first blush that one may be tempted to brush it off with a quick answer, like I tried to do.

    “Well, this was such a special yeshiva that it may have caused the talmididm to have too high of a self-worth” I first suggested.

    “But in every generation-going back to Shem and Eiver, there have been many special and unique yeshivos, and we do not find that those students suffered from this yetzer hara” he rebutted.

    I said I would think about it. And I did. Throughout yom tov I continually returned to this question in my mind. But each time that I would come up with a suggestion I would quickly realize its inherent weakness, only to start thinking about it again.

    On the second day of Shavuos I was reviewing a famous gemara in Nedarim (50a) that tells us of the amazing life of Rebbe Akiva. After leaving his wife to go learn forfor 12 years he returns only to realize that she would be willing to give more years. So as not to make his leaving difficult, he heads back to yeshiva right away. Another 12 years pass, this time he returns to town with 24,000 students in tow.

    I read the gemara again just to make sure that I did not misread what I saw.

    Could it be? Did I just discover what was unique about his yeshiva?! Rebbe Akiva built this yeshiva during the time he was away from his wife and family.

    It is important to learn Torah from one’s Rosh Yeshiva, and to learn middos from him as well. But when do you see the Rosh Yeshiva interact with a co-equal? When do you learn to emulate how he acts? And, through this, how to speak to your chavrusah, your friends in the dormitory? If you are like many, it is when you see how your rebbe interacts with his family, his spouse and those in his life.

    Rebbe Akiva, of course, did nothing incorrect. He led his yeshiva with dignity and grace, and taught them every day that v’ohavta l’rayacha kemochah is a klal gadol b’Torah. However, his was a unique yeshiva as it was formed, as the gemara relates, away from the rosh yeshiva’s wife.

    His talmidim never had the opportunity to witness his interactions at the Shabbos table.

    When I told this approach to my congregant he was elated, but I was frightened. It reminded me that as a rav most of my teachings would not come through powerful sermons, rather by what the shul will witness with their own eyes; how I behave, how I treat my co-equals.

    I was reminded of the story of Rav Shlomo Zalman Aurbach who while walking home with a talmid arrived at his home. Before entering he made sure to clean his beard and wipe his suit clean. The student remarked to his rebbe that he was likely doing this because he wished to look proper for his rebbetzin.

    Rav Aurbach responded that while that was a part of it, the ikar reason for his cleaning his clothes is because chazal teach that when there is shalom bayis in a home the shechinah itself dwells therein, and he was prepapring himself to greet the shechinah!

    Imagine the impression that made on this student!

    In honor of this year’s Shavuos issue we dedicated this space to demonstrate the mysterious origins of some of the more common maxims among the Jewish people.

    Many of these were mistakenly thought to be taken directly from chazal. There is another type of phrase used equally as common, and that we know do not stem from chazal. Often these are in Yiddish, and just as often reveal a nation steeped in Torah and its ways.

    One of these is the minhag among many to call last week’s Shabbos (parshas nasso), the Shabbos after Shavuos ‘shabbos nuch shavuos’- the Shabbos after Shavuos.

    We do not find this expression after Sukkos or Pesach, only Shavuos.

    Why?

    Some explain this phrase (Kol Mevaser) that since we know that the Torah was given on Shabbos we wish to remember this fact with this statement.

    Many others explain based on the gemara (Chagigah 26) that the multitude of olei regalim were shown the miraculous lechem hapanim on Shabbos chol hamoed. Since Shavuos does not contain a chol hamoed they would show this ness to am yisroel on the Shabbos nuch shavuos

    The late Lubavitcher Rebbe explains this phrase based on a statement found in the Rambam. At the end of seder ahava Rambam lists the order of teffilos and gives us the language of yaaleh v’yavo for chol hamoed pesach, sukkos and shavuos”. But shavuos has no chol hamoed! Rather the week of tashlumin after Shavuos must then carry mamesh the same weight as shavuos itself, and for this reason do we give the Shabbos and week after this unique phrase.

    However, the sefer Divrei Dovid, from the son of Reb Yisroel of Razdzin gives us another, beautiful, explanation for this expression.

    The Yiddish word ‘nuch’ can be ‘after’-causing this axiom to be translated innocently as ‘the Shabbos after Shavuos’. However, the word ‘nuch’ can also mean something else: ‘still’. With this translation, the phrase really means something quite intriguing: ‘the Shabbos that is still Shavuos’.

    It is for this reason, says ‘Pardes Yosef Hachodosh’ (Nasso, first entry), that the midrashim on parshas nasso and the parshios to follow are longer than those on any other parsha –for the influence of Shavuos does not fade, our rededication to the Torah that we embraced on Shavuos does not falter, and our endearment to His code only grows stronger after this yom tov, all this causes an expansion of our understanding of the Torah for weeks to come !

    Hopefully, in addition to learning about this phrase, I have also given myself permission to talk about one small incident that took place over shavuos, an incident that re-enforced my, and every rav’s job as a teacher of Torah.

  • RAV NOTA GREENBLATT, ZT”L

    RAV NOTA GREENBLATT, ZT”L

    BY: RABBI MOSHE TAUB

    WE WILL OPEN WITH A SHORTER BIO & PERSONAL REFLECTIONS

    I.          A Loss for Klal Yisroel

          This past erev Shabbos parshas acharei mos, klal yisroel lost one of its most unique poskim and American rabbanim, Rav Nota Tzvi Greenblatt, at the age of 96. Rav Nota, as he was known by thousands, was born in 1925 in Washington D.C. to Rav Yitzchak, and his mother, Sara Rivka neé Appelbaum. His parents were originally natives of Brisk, and Rav Chaim Solaveitchik was their mesader kiddushin. His father was in America collecting funds for the Brisker yeshiva Toras Chesed, and soon assumed his position in Washington. After serving as a rav in Washington, and then in New York State, Rav Yitzchak would later become a rav in Newark, N.J. where he opened up its first Day School. A masmid at a young age, in the 1930’s Rav Nota would join a chabura under Rav Dovid Leibowitz in the new Yeshivas Chofetz Chaim. He was thirteen years old at the time!

         Later, after spending time with Rav Soloveitchik and Rav Michel Feinstein in Boston, Rav Nota would Rav Michel to the Lower East Side and spend the next several years under the tutelage of Rav Moshe Feinstein. Rav Nota was known as one of Rav Moshe’s closest talmidim.

         Soon, after spending some years in eretz yisroel, Rav Nota would move to Memphis. Rav Binyamin Kamenetzky drove Rav Nota to the train station in 1949 for Rav Nota’s trip to Memphis to assume the position of Talmud Torah teacher and chazan of the Anshei Sefard shul, and his meeting with destiny. Rav Binyamin said upon dropping him off,  “I will be back in tow years to pick you up”. However, Rav Nota would stay in Memphis until just last year.

       Soon after his arrival in Memphis, he would hear of a ‘Kaplan girl’ who could not find a shidduch, as she keeps Shabbos and Torah and the South offered few men who had her Torah aspirations. Rav Nota thought that such a girl -who, along with her family, could maintain yiddeshkeit in the South without even the benefit of a traditional Beis Yaakov education -was someone for him. They were soon married, and she and their five children would join Rav Nota in sacrificing for the community and the klal, as we shall see below.

         Aside for building its Day School, High School and yeshivos, he was far from a simple local Memphis rav. Rav Nota spent several decades travelling around the globe each-and-every week writing gittin, performing milos, and taking care of all matters where there was no rav, or the rav felt unworthy.

         He was the posek that many well-known poskim would call. His calls and his calling brought him to travel all over the world -which he did until well into his nineties.

         Yehi Zichro Baruch.

    II.         One Person’s Story

        I am not worthy to be writing about Rav Nota. I am far from his closest talmidim. However, as mentioned above, Rav Nota travelled the world, and forged bonds with rabbanim in many cities, both large and small. My connection with him is not special considering how he lived his life for the klal, which is what makes it so…special! The impact he had on so many of us was enormous, and we each felt a unique and distinctive bond with him. He would always tell us how important our sacrifice was and give important words of encouragement to our wives who needed it most.

          Interestingly, Dr. Rubin Cooper was the first to inform me. “Rav Notta Greenblatt, BDE” was all he wrote last erev Shabbos parshas Acharei Mos. Dr. Cooper is a renown pediatric cardiologist, well respected among his peers and in the medical profession. He is also a prior president of our shul.

        However, he is not a big ‘texter’, and, in the moment, I did not focus on the incongruity of it being him, of all people, sending me this information; however, the explanation to this would on Shabbos, when Dr. Cooper, for the first time, shared that Rav Nota had spoken to him when my shul was thinking of hiring me. Yet another item added to the list for which I owe Rav Nota hakaros hatov, and his taking time for the needs of all.

         When I received the text, I was numb. Waves of memories poured over me. When feeling finally came back, it was not sadness that first hit, rather a more selfish one: regret.

        You see, for the past year and a half, my eldest daughter, Racheli, had been urging me to visit Rav Greenblatt in Memphis. Being the oldest, she has the most vivid memories of the many days Rav Nota spent in our home.

        Calling him was no longer the option it once was due to a precipitous decline in his hearing and health. Going to see him in person was always something I was planning ‘next week’. This was yet another painful reminder of the mishnah in avos: “Al tomar l’kshe’efna eshneh. Shema lo tipaneh -don’t say ‘when I have the time’, for perhaps that time will never arrive”. For the reader with such plans on his mind relating to their own rebbeim, close the magazine right now and just GO!

        I needed to hear his voice, so I ran to my computer to find a recording I made with him. We would stay up late and sit in my study or dining room table where he would regale me with stories of his life, early America, Brisk and the many gedolim he encountered. He learnt by Rav Moshe Feinstein when Rav Moshe’s beard was still jet-black, and one would marvel at their closeness. Alas, I have, as of yet, been unable to locate this recording. For now, my private memories will have to suffice. Because of the timing of this writing, what follows are devarim hayotzim min halev, and although somewhat without order, I hope it suffices in giving the reader a picture of what we had, and what was lost. Read on, you will be amazed.

    III.        The Man

         Rav Nota was a true, living ‘Brisker’. Not a ‘Brisker’ as we may define it today -as having learnt by Rav Dovid, Rav Berel, or Rav Avraham Yehoshua. Although that imprimatur is a dignified one, Rav Nota was a Brisker in a different sense.  His father, Rav Yitzchak, and his mother, Sara Rivka neé Appelbaum, were Brisk natives, having first come to America to collect funds for the Yeshiva on Kisawa St. in Belarus.  His father instilled in him the avirah d’brisk. His older sister, when asked to describe Rav Nota as a child, said, “From the age of seven onward, Nota would leave the house at six in the morning and wouldn’t return till late at night”! Speaking of Brisk, Rav Nota would soon learn in Boston under Rav Michel Feinstein who had learnt under the Brisker Rav -Rav Michel would marry the Brisker Rav’s daughter soon after leaving America.

         The America that Rav Nota was born into was vastly different than our own. He shared with me how he once walked several miles with friends on a two-day yom tov just to see the face of a ger, so inspired were they as children in the early 1930’s that someone would convert to yiddeshkeit when it was yet to thrive here!

        His Brisker mentality was seen in his caring for only Torah and Truth as well.

          On Truth: I recall once sharing with him an idea on the parsha. Rabbanim -and I speak of myself here -can sometimes search too hard for a heart-pulling idea on the parsha, losing focus on the amito she hadavar.    

           Naïvely, I was proud of an original idea and how it worked in the derasha the Shabbos before. So, sitting at the dinner table, I shared the kasha with which I opened. “Nu, ah gutta kasha!” he said. But then I told him what my then twenty-five year old self said as an answer, so as to inspire his shul. Let’s just say the answer -while innocent -was not a ‘brisker’ approach. Rather, it was saccharine, pulpit-y and mawkish. One of those ideas for which the only proof to it being emes or not would be how someone may ‘feel’ upon hearing it, and not mesorah or chazal.

       He was having none of it.

       He looked at me as a parent to a child who was let down. “Let me tell you”, he began, as I leaned in hoping for a compliment, “One thing is for sure…Notty Greenblatt would never say such a pshat!” He said this with pride. My wife, in reaction, could not help but to begin laughing, enjoying the needed come-down to her young, newly-minted rav husband.

       The reader may take the above as a ‘sharp’ retort -and Rav Nota could be biting -but he would also have a keen ability to disarm anyone he met, as we will see in some amazing stories below. He had a unique skill in that he was able to tell it like it is without ever offending. In fact, on the contrary, people would thirst for it. In Buffalo, thousands of visitors would come through during the year for davening. I would often ask the chashuvim to speak in my stead in-between mincha and maariv. They always spoke well, and tailored their remarks to such a crowd, as they perceived them. Not Rav Nota. Not only would he speak to them as if he was giving a shiur to the greatest lamdanim, he would never shy away from saying things exactly as he saw them. Never once did anyone complain; indeed, they looked forward to his perennial visits.

        To him toras emes should not change based on one’s audience. How one gives it over may be different; but not What one gives over”.

          And, on Torah: while I will share more stories on this theme below, here I will share one. I once received a very complex shailah. After working on it for the better part of the day, I decided to call Rav Nota in Memphis. He was not home, and I left a message. A few more hours pass, and I finally came across a seemingly obscure and cryptic comment of the Magen Avraham in hilchos yom tov that I thought may be a good source l’hatir (to allow). A few minutes later my cell rang. It was Rav Nota. I shared with him this very rare and unique shailah, and without missing a beat, he exclaimed, “It’s a mefurash Magen Avraham in hilchos yom tov…”!

    IV.        Lav Ish Itti Anochi

          To understand his eclectic life, one could start by looking at his sefer on chumash, titled K’rayach Sadeh. Because it was published after the passing of Rav Moshe Feinstein, his rebbe muvhak, there is but one haskama, from his other rebbe, Rav Michel Feinstein.

          After learning under Rav Dovid Leibowitz, and before Rav Moshe, Rav Nota learnt by Rav Michel. Before I go on, I should point out the video that has been making the rounds these past few days. In the 1920’s a gadol made a comment at an agudas harabbanim meeting that he feared American boys will never be great bnei Torah. In the words of Rav Nota, “They thought all we cared about was if the Dodgers or the Yankees would win the World Series. But Rav Dovid responded that we can become greater than the boys in Lita! He believed in us”

         The haskama from Rav Michel shares some American Jewish history unknown to many. It reads: “In 1941 I was in Boston” – Rav Michel arrived in America together with Rav Aaron Kotler that year –“There, we had a group of students who were exceptional in their Torah” -This yeshiva was named Yeshivas Heichel Rav Chaim, and was run by Rav Michel together with Rav Soloveitchik, before he would assume his title at Yeshiva University – “I would there give shiur to these boys, the youngest among them was the esteemed gaon Rav Nota Greenblatt, shlit’a. He was then also a great aid to me in preparing articles for the Torah journal HaPardes…”. Rav Nota would have been all but sixteen at the time.

         As I was looking at the sefer in preparation for this expeditiously written article, to my amazement, I noticed one page that I must have folded onto itself years ago to mark an idea therein. I was shocked to discover that it was an idea on the parsha of his petira, acharei mos. What is even more remarkable is that not only was it the rare entry that was not lomdus, but it also perfectly captured Rav Nota as a person.

         The pasuk describes the man who takes the Azazel on yom kippur as ‘ish itti’. The meforshim debate precisely to what this term. Rashi teaches that this term itti denotes to the fact that this person was set aside already before yom kippur, which the Gur Aryeh explains is alluded to by its shoresh -eis, time.

         Rav Nota takes this shoresh idea one amazing step further (translation and errors my own):

    “The world/reality of the type of person who is drawn toward sin is that of the ish itti, ‘A Man of the Times’; a person who lives and is swayed symbiotically along with the winds of the cultural and social milieu. It is only appropriate that such a person be the one who handles such a sacrifice, the very symbol of sin. A korban in the beis hamikdosh, however, as in the other avodas yom kippur, especially in the kodosh hakodhim, is represented by an old man, as the gemara quotes Shimon HaTzadik as witnessing every year (Menachos 109b)…”.

        When I met Rav Nota he was that old-man, unchanging from the Torah and mesora of his youth.  After moving to Memphis in the late 1940’s he never changed. He was in his mid-eighties when I first met him but stuck in a ‘time warp’. If you wanted to know what a yeshiva bochur in the 1940’s looked like, talked like, learned like, you only had to meet him. His slicked back hair, a goatee and a straw hat, and, all along with a mastery of shas, poskim and middos. Memphis never changed him, rather he changed Memphis! He was the quintessential lav ish itti anochi!

         Rav Moshe Heinemann, the Rav of Agudah of Baltimore and the posek for the Star-K shared by the levaya that Rav Nota dressed like a simple man only to abstain from kavod.

    V.         Rav Nota and Rav Moshe

         Writers would often call Rav Nota to ask for stories of his rebbe, Rav Moshe Feinstein. While he would always share these in conversation, he was often a little more reluctant to share them with writers. I only know this because I once received a call from someone working on a sefer about the hashkafos of Rav Moshe. “I never met Rav Moshe, why are you calling me?” I asked in wonderment. “Rav Nota gave me your name to call”. I laughed out loud. I explained that this is likely because he was just by my home. When he stays by me, I always press him on Rav Moshe. While much of what he shared is not for public, a few incidents I feel I can repeat.

       He was once walking with Rav Moshe in Connecticut one summer. Relaxed, he felt comfortable asking his rebbe, “When did rebbe first finish shas?” He shared that Rav Moshe responded that while he could not remember if he was fourteen, fifteen, or sixteen, he did recall the date. “Daled adar”, he said.

          Wow! This is why chazal teach us to listen to the sichos chullin of our chachamim. Perhaps the reader caught the amazing gem hidden in this story. Rav Moshe’s birthday was zayin adar. This means, although he was working on this goal of finishing shas -we would imagine -for some time, he did not speed up or slow down to mark this milestone on his birthday (Rav Moshe would call his children and grandchildren on theirs, so we know he marked such dates). Rather, his learning was not tied to sentimentality, or his precious time and schedule!

        His relationship with Rav Moshe ran very deep. He left Boston with Rav Michel to MTJ, and there developed a life-long rebbe in Rav Moshe.

         His son recounted learning a teshuva from Rav Moshe with his father (many teshuvos in Igros Moshe were written to Rav Nota, and his nephew, Rav Efraim). This was relating to a pressing case at hand. As they were reviewing it, Rav Nota kept questioning Rav Moshe’s sevaros (logic) and rayos (proofs), even commenting that it was hard to fathom how Rav Moshe came to such a psak. However, to his son’s surprise, when they concluded, he picked up the phone and described how to handle the case according the teshuva they just read. His son questioned his father, “What about all the questions you had on it?” Rav Nota replied that what came from Rav Moshe was as if it came from the lishkas hagaziz (where the Sanhedrin sat), no matter our questions!”

         This is similar to how Rav Chaim once sent a shailah to Rav Yitzchok Elchanan and requested to send back the psak only and not the sevaros. “Sevaros I can always refute, but a psak from the posek hador is untouchable.

          As Rav Nota felt about his rebbe, Rav Moshe felt about him. A few weeks ago, the family found a hamlatza (letter of approval/acceptance) that Rav Moshe wrote for the-then twenty-one year old Rav Nota when he went to learn in eretz yisroel. “He will be the primary baal horoah in America one day” Rav Moshe wrote!

         Let me share two more stories he shared about his rebbe. He chose these stories wisely to share with a young rabbi out of town. There was once an individual who took it upon himself to make a mocheh (protest) against Rav Moshe and his psakim (rulings). While this had happened before, this man went the extra mile. He was able to print a sefer with the same font and look of an Igros Moshe, only to, in order, seek to undermine and dismantle each of Rav Moshe’s points to each teshuva, and written with a disregard of derech eretz. Rav Nota was in Memphis at the time and was unaware of this development. A few weeks after the publication of this book, Rav Nota was visiting Rav Moshe in MTJ. A group from the yeshiva surrounded him and filled him in. “You have to speak to the rosh yeshiva, he must make a public mocheh against this breach in kavod haTorah!” they exclaimed.

        “I too was incensed!” Rav Nota shared. “But, let me tell you, Rav Moshe was smarter than us all. When I went into his office, I cried out, ‘Rebbe, rebbe! What of kavod haTorah?!’ Rav Moshe looked at me and smiled. If I go to the beis midrash and klap on the bima and protest, do you know what will happen next? Everyone will run out and buy this book. If I am quiet, the storm will pass. Soon no one will know this book’s name’”.

        Looking at me with a twinkle in his eye, Rav Nota asked, “Nu R’ Moshe Mordechai! “Do you know the name of that book?”

        “No” I admitted.

           “Aha! That was the pikchus of Rav Moshe!”

         I only once saw Rav Nota cry, and it was when he was describing his rebbe.

         We were sitting in my office in Buffalo late one night -after a day of writing gittin, see below – when he started to pace my office and peruse its sefarim. He took out a yaaros devash, held it in his hand and began to sob.

        I waited, and he then shared:

          “I was by his kever. So many tzadikim are buried all around him, but only by Rav Eibishitz does the matzeiva I read ‘ish kodosh’. Do you know why? Rav Eibishitz was one of the most prolific writers in our history. Yet, he did this, while surrounded by machlokos. Rav Yaakov Emden, as is known, not only battled against him, but lived just down the street. Families in klal yisroel were split due to this machlokos. And yet, he was kodosh -able to separate himself -and focus on Torah.

        “So too my rebbe.” He began to cry again. “No one could learn during the early 1940’s. The news would slowly trickle in and the rebbeim would sometimes open their gemaros and begin to cry like newborns. Who could blame them? They were reading about their parents, brothers and sisters, about whom they were reading about! The Holocaust was having its first impact on the first ‘survivors’.

       “There was only one man then who learnt like nothing was happening in the world -a kodosh, a man apart -my rebbe Rav Moshe Feinstein”

        I was surprised to hear myself question this. “But shouldn’t a gadol be broken from such destruction?” I asked.

        “You think he was not broken? The SCREAMS that came from Rav Moshe during davening were deafening. But as soon as the last amein from the last kaddish was said, Rav Moshe -ish kodosh – would wipe the last tear from his cheek, gird himself, and only then learn like nothing was going on”

       Wow!

          At his levaya, one of Rav Nota’s talmidim, shared a story that demonatrates how Rav Nota acted on this message. One evening some decades ago, Rav Nota was giving a chabura. It was normal to have calls come in during the shiur, some of which Rav Nota having to take. The bochurim and yungeleit were used to this. But this time, something was different. Rav Nota was not responding with many words, just a simple, “Yes” or “Ok”, or “I see”. After each of these terse calls, he would return to the shiur at hand, only for the phone to ring again, with Rav Nota, again, answering swiftly.

       It was only when the shiur was over that the boys discovered that Rav Moshe was just niftar and that was what these calls were about. Imagine! His own rebbe muvhak, and yet, it was during shiur, so he had to be short so as to focus on the learning at hand; he could cry later. Kodosh indeed!

    VI.        30,000 Gittin?     

    Rav Berel Feinstein, the current Rosh Yeshiva of MTJ shared in his hesped that Rav Nota was the Shmuel of our dor. Like Shmuel he traveled all over to judge. As the reader will soon see, this was no exaggeration.

       It is here, finally, we arrive at the true gadlus of Rav Nota, his rebbitzen, and how I got to know him.

         Many years ago, as a young rav in Memphis, there was a man in need of a get. Rav Nota was busy building the day schools and the community and assured the man and his wife that it will be taken care of. But one day there was a knock at the door. What I am about to tell you is true -I heard it from Rav Nota himself, and confirmed it with his nephew, Rav Menachem Greenblatt, Rav of the Agudah in St. Loise.

       Opening the door, Rav Nota saw the man draw a gun. “Rabbi” he began in his southern drawl, “I need that get, and I ain’t leaving here till I have it!”

         Rav Nota brought him in -or maybe, better said, the man with the gun lef Rav Nota -into his study. It was then and there that Rav Nota called Rav Moshe who reviewed hilchos gittin on the phone with Rav Nota, and answered several relevant issues for writing a get in Memphis (each city must be written in a certain way, with particular descriptors). The rest is American history.

        If one thinks that the above story is wild, Rav Nota said to his son once of himself, “There is nothing that could happen to a rav that I have not experienced!”

        His son recounted that over sixty-five years Rav Nota wrote some thirty-thousand gittin. I was not sure if this was a guzma (exaggeration), but the cheshbon works out. Most weeks, Rav Nota would awaken Sunday morning, pack his bags and return Thursday. He would travel to the most far-flung areas of the country. If a get needed to be written, he was there. He may have written more gittin than anyone in the history of am yisroel!

        When I would bring him to Buffalo a few times a year, it was only after an accumulation of gittin needed -in the frum, conservative and reform communities. So, if he wrote, say, an average of two gittin in each city he stopped in, and was in a different city each day (he often was!) and did this, say forty weeks out of the year, for sixty-five years, that already brings us to over twenty-thousand gittin.

          His son recounted that he never saw his father during the week. Imagine the sacrifice for these agunos, for kedushas am yisroel. Imagine the sacrifice of his rebbitzen, may she be well!

        Often, he would arrive home on a Thursday after five days on the road exhausted. “Daddy, let me feed you” recounted his son. “Let us first go to shul to daven Maariv. But, before they left, invariably, the phone would ring. It was a woman, or a man, or a rav. A get was needed, or some other serious matter, and the cycle would continue again.

         I once witnessed this myself. After a day of writing gittin in Buffalo, I walked Rav Nota upstairs well passed midnight. His cell phone rang. I could hear tha man screaming through the other end. When the call was finished, Rav Nota shared the story behind it. It was a severe case in hilchos nashim, and this frum man was not allowed to marry a certain frum woman due to a prior forbidden relationship. The man was crying, “Please rebbe! There must be a way!” But there wasn’t.

        If I may be so bold, I was surprised that all of these ‘free aguna’ organizations did not show at his levaya. No one has done more for women bound to prior marriages as Rav Nota had, perhaps in the history of am yisroel!

        I -and the myriad of other rabbanim who would write gittin with him -witnessed the most brilliant skill in which he worked,

        Rav Heinemann shared how there was once a man that refused to give a get, this after Rav Nota travelled a great distance to write it.

       “I have no time, Rabbi” claimed the husband.

    “Tell me, do you travel” asked Rav Nota.

       “Of course, for business and pleasure”.

       “When is your next flight?”

        The man shared the information. Rav Nota then asserted that surely he doesn’t work on the plane. He then, along with eidim, etc. joined that flight a few weeks later to write the get!

        Rav Heinemann then marveled. “To write a get one has to state the city etc. in where it is written. How does one do that on a plane travelling over great distances? Only Rav Nota could figure that out!”

        He would arrive at my house with some bread and a boiled egg. My wife would learn to always have read some hot water and a cookie or cake. He was not a man of great tastes or luxury.

    VII.       Get Stories and More

        Rav Heinemann shared in his hesped a fascinating story. He once had to do a chalitza. The problem was the man was in jail. After negotiating, they agreed for a one-day release. But there was a catch: to release him they had to put on a monitoring device on his foot. Without getting into all the halachic details, suffice it to say that such a device on one’s foot may be in an issue for a chalitza.

        Rav Heinemann called Rav Nota and was surprised when he responded that he needs three hours to get back to him. “Surely Rav Nota could give an answer on the spot” Rav Heinemann wondered. Three hours later, Rav Nota called back. It only then became clear why he needed this time. First Rav Nota went to the local prison. He wanted to see this ankle bracelet. Suffice it to say, they didn’t let him in. Then he went to the local police station. Being a Sunday, no one could help him. He then went to knock on the homes of local judges, etc.. This is why he needed three hours!

        Anyone who met Rav Nota would not be surprised by his sacrifice for the klal and halacha.

         One would think after having written so many gittin, he would become immune. Not so. The first time I flew him to Buffalo, we arrived back home late at night after a day of writing gittin, mostly for people even I never met. My wife, Nechama, is a brilliant person in her own right, and asked Rav Nota if she could see -first hand a get. Rav Nota let out a shriek. “The daled amos of a home should never here that term uttered!” After composing himself, this eighty-five year old man, after some twenty-thousand gittin, then said, “I understand your curiosity. I will show you one, but not in the house”. I watched as she followed him outside -at least daled amos from our home -and showed it to her. 

        Another time, I flew him in just for one get. This was rare, but it was needed. A well-to-do man about town left his wife an agunah for many years. And, although not frum, she refused to remarry without a get. Finally, he agreed to give it.

        I quickly flew in Rav Nota. Alas, the husband was a no-show. “Lets go to his office” said Rav Nota. The wife did not seem to believe this would make a difference, and to be honest, neither did I.

         While I cannot disclose where this office was, suffice it to say, he was a very powerful man. I walk into his office with Rav Nota, and the man -to my shock -shares how he went to Torah V’Daas as a child. He began cursing out all that his holy…in very unholy ways.

        I started to tremble. “We flew Rabbi Greenblatt, who is not spring chicken, to Buffalo, NY, and now you are pulling this shtick…?!”

        Rav Nota cut me off. I can still hear the words today that he whispered in my ear, “Rav Moshe Mordechai ben Harav Baruch Alter hakohein (that is what he would call me when he meant business, as its how I signed countless gittin), go pull up the car. We will be down in a moment.”

        I begrudgingly complied, leaving Rav Nota alone with the husband still cursing and blaspheming halacha, gittin and Toras Moshe.

        Not three minutes passed, and I get the car to the front of the building. Right on cue, Rav Nota walk out with his arm linked in the arm of this husband, whose face was pale as if he just saw a ghost.

        The writing of the get was quiet and adventure-less.  Finally, alone in the car on the way back to my home, I asked: “What did Rav Greenblatt say to him when I left? How did the rav change his demeaner so?”

         “Freg nisht kein shailos, R’ Moshe Mordechai, don’t ask such questions”. Till this day, I never found out what he said. The husband has since passed.

        Sometimes in Buffalo -and in the many oher cities he would visit each and every week -finding eidim to sign the get was not simple. I have watched him train simple balla battim in the art of eidus and ksav ashirus. Not only did he not make them feel foolish, but they walked away feeling like kings.

         Rav Yirmiyahu Milevsky, my predeccesor in Buffalo, and then a rav in Memphis (now a rav in Toronto) shared that the goy to whom Rav Nota would sell the city’s chometz would feel the same way. He would leave the meeting erev Pesach feeling like a king. Rav Nota would sell it to a simple, yet sharp man. But he would beam with pride that the rabbi of the city spent this time with him and entrusted him with ‘Jewish Law’.

    VIII.      More Gittin Stories

    Rav Akiva Tendler, rav of Kahal Bnei Torah in Monsey, and a rabbinical coordinator for the OU, shared with me the following. In the early 1980’s he was learning in the famed yeshiva of Scranton. They were learning meseches gittin at the time, and the bochurim were excited to learn that Rav Nota was in town to write gittin. This way, they could witness first-hand what they were learning in yeshiva. R’ Akiva and some friends went to the shul where Rav Nota was working, when the gabbei stopped them. Turning to Rav Nota, he said, “Perhaps it is not appropriate to have these innocent yeshiva students be here for a get?”

        Rav Nota thought for a moment, and said, “Let them in, perhaps one of them will be a mesader gittin one day and can learn from this”.

       Rav Akiva was greatly inspired by this. And today is indeed a well-regarded mesader gittin.

        To get a feel for just how much Rav Berel’s words of Rav Nota being the Shmuel of our generation ring true, let me share the following. After a few days of gittin it was time for Rav Nota to leave. He informed me that he had to be in some far-flung city (North America, South America, I couldn’t keep track) to write gittin in the morning. “What time does the rav need to be in the airport to catch his flight?” I asked.

        Rav Nota laughed. What I am about to say is hard to believe, but I saw it with my own eyes. He took out the most interesting card, made of metal. “I have flown so many miles, that the airline gave me this card. Only two or three people in the world have it. When I go to the airport I can get on any plane, at any time”!

         A Shmuel of our dor indeed!

       Rav Milevsky shared how Rav Nota would always travel with a razer, so as to cut the get after mesirah. Rav Nota knew everyone at security at the Memphis airport, of course.  After 9/11, they went through his bag and found the razor. “Rabbi Greenblatt, we are sorry, but we can not let you on the plane with this”.

       “But you know me! Do you think I am a terrorist?”

       “No, no, of course not Rabbi Greenblatt!”

        “Well what f a real terrorist, Heaven forfend, does get onto this plane. Will you be ok if you took away the one weapon I could have used to foiled the plot?”

        They all laughed…but the razor was left behind.

          Allow me to conclude this section with two critical points. Out of thirty-thousand gitin, and million upon millions of miles travelled over seven decades, Rav Nota was only mattir two women to marry without a get. There are few who had the power to do so. But no one should ever think he was a kal, chalila. This leads to my second point, by way of a last get story. I once received a call from a prominent beis din. They were researching a case of mamzeiros. One of the notable and scholarly rabbis of the early Conservative movement lived in Buffalo. He was the one who wrote the get that could free these children. I was asked if I would go the Buffalo University to review his archives and see if I can locate this get. The story of the amazing discoveries and letters found in this archive is its own story, for another time. I was able to locate his file of gittin. Before I called back this beis din, I thought to call Rav Nota. He was furious. “Under no circumstances to play games with this. Conservative gitin are meaningless. Tell this beis din you couldn’t make it”.

    IX.        Memphis

    It would only be proper if I leave Rav Nota’s footprint on the city of Memphis to someone from that town. The Torah he built, the dorei doros of Torah he molded. But a few vignettes I will share.

       His son recounted at the levaya that he asked his father if he was ever scared, at the young age of twenty-four, if the day school he was starting would fail.

       “Never! The Torah sells itself. I all I needed were children.”

    He then shared a great secret of chinuch. “Sometimes, simply pausing to collect oneself at the mention of Avraham and Sarah can have a great impact on a child.”

       Rav Milevsky shared that at one meeting among rabbis there was a question about kevura. Everyone said their piece, but then Rav Nota spoke. “We can bring a raya from Rambam in hilchos bigei kahuna…”.

         When there was no mohel in the early days of Memphis, he trained to become one. When people complained, “Why would I get a rabbi when I could use a doctor?”, Rav Nota purchased a doctor’s white coat and a doctor’s bag in which to carry his tools.

        His home was open to all. And I mean ALL. He was kulo chesed. He and, lhbch’lch, his rebbitzen, taught several generations what it means to be a Torah Jew.

    X.         Back Home

    His son shared how a few years ago they came to visit MTJ. Although it had been some seventy-five years, it was as if he never left. Rav Nota did not wish to leave. But, sadly, it was time to go.

       As he suffered a precipitous decline this past year, he would speak to his son in the middle of the night. He always had one request, “Maybe we can go to the yeshiva today?” Unfortunately, that second trip never worked out.

        Speaking at MTJ at the leavaya, with his father’s aron in the beis midrash where his guf toiled countless hours so many years ago, his son cried out, “Daddy, I finally brought you back to yeshiva!”.

        On behalf of the klal I thank the Greenblatt children and their mother for the sacrifice they made on behalf of all of us for so many decades.

        Zechuso Shel Rav Nota Zvi Ben Yitzhok YaGein Aleinu.

  • No Talking After Shul: Rabbis and Confidentiality

    No Talking After Shul: Rabbis and Confidentiality

    In January of 1973 a young political philosophy professor at the University of Toronto named George Will (PhD) began to write for National Review magazine. While he would eventually go on to win a Pulitzer Prize and to become a staple of American intellectual punditry, he, then, was having trouble coming up with new columns week after week; he approached the magazine’s founder, legendary writer, and father of modern conservatism William F. Buckley. “I asked Bill Buckley what I now know is the question most frequently asked of a columnist: How do you come up with things to write about. Bill’s answer was: “The world irritates me three times a week and sometimes a little more often. I don’t have any problem coming up with ideas.”

    Several weeks ago fellow contributor to Ami, Rabbi Mordechai Kamentzky, bemoaned the difficulty inherent in coming up with a relatively lengthy weekly column.

    While this is a common concern, and one that I share, somehow it works itself out for him, myself and others, and thousands of magazines are published weekly around the globe with tens of thousands of writers composing new and hopefully informative and interesting content.

    Writing a column on the rabbinate, sometimes, brings with it a related but somewhat reverse concern. Because rabbis, like lawyers, maintain the privilege of confidentiality – and may even be sued should they breach that trust – according to NY State law C.P.L.R. 4505, “…a clergyman… shall not be allowed to disclose a confession or confidence made to him…” – the most fascinating experiences that I have been fortunate enough to have been involved in can not be disclosed in these pages. In addition, the more interesting shailos, political quandaries, and counseling issues must never be even alluded to should the people involved become revealed. In fact, soon after I began to write this weekly column some members –and even friends- approached me to share their concern that I can easily reveal too much. Some have been hesitant to share sensitive matters with me. Of course, while an understandable concern, it is has been shown to have been unfounded as I would never disclose sensitive matters.

    In fact rabbis learn early on how to keep secrets, even if it harms them. Allow me to give an example: One weekday morning there was an avel in shul. This person was from Eretz Yisroel and came to Buffalo to bury his father. Because there was no minyan in his mother’s home he was planning on davening by us each morning, this day being the first. So the natural question was Do we say tachanun? In other words does a shul take on the status of a bais avel (shiva-house) in which tachanun is omitted, or, do we view it as a beis haknesses that an avel is simply visiting. What is more, many people did not even know that this guest was in the midst of shiva – as he was not acting as the shliach tzibbur, and the tear in his clothing went unnoticed.

    To be sure, this question is discussed by the classic sources (e.g. Mishnah Berrura 130:20). Generally a shul will not take on the status of a beis avel and tachanun would therefore be recited. But this halachah is not a zero-sum organism, as certain undisclosed facts can change entirely the final law, as there can be circumstances in which a shul would have a quasi-status of a beis avel and tachanun would then not be said.

    Because of certain facts that I could not reveal to my balla battim, gabbaim, and certainly not in these pages I decided that tachanun should not be said. This was based on certain facts as well as a precedent set by Reb Shlomo Zalman Aurbach (See for example Ishei Yisroel, page 266, footnote 75-77 for a comparable ruling).

    So when I announced to the gabbai not to say tachunun he had no choice but to follow, although he did not even know an avel was in shul. One guest came over to me and asked the reason behind my ruling. I explained to him that there was an avel davening with us. “So what? The Mishnah Berrura says…” I tried to stop him short by quoting the very same Mishnah Berrura hopeful that informing him of my knowledge in this area would foster some trust and calm him down. This did not work, and this man made a point of putting down his head for tachanun in front of me.

    Rabbi Yisroel Reisman is quoted as once remarking “A non-Jew will never know the thrill of not having to say tachanun on Mondays and Thursdays”; apparently this man never got that memo.

    Now, I do not completely fault this individual; he did not know me and based on the information he was given, in his mind, I had made a huge blunder. While it would have been freeing to simply explain the facts not known to him, I could not do that and I, although momentary, looked like a fool.

    More stressful than the above example is the fact that I cannot reveal things to my wife.

    There is a married member in my shul who is –remotely, through Yeshiva University – working on attaining his semicha. A part of the YU semicha process is a wonderful shimush program. So, using me as his ‘mentor’ he is allowed to sit in during meetings and counseling sessions –should the relevant parties consent. (As an aside: what a wonderful image of achdus (unity) to have a musmach from Lakewood work with a candidate musmach from Yeshiva University!)

     Some weeks ago he had sat in on a passionate and intense session. It lasted deep into the night and when it was time to go home he asked if he could talk to his wife about what had transpired. After all, he explained, she sacrificed the evening so that he could attend. I explained that this too is part of rabbanus and its training; that however painful it is, one’s wife must not only be kept out of the loop but, and this takes real strength, be convinced that there is nothing even going on.

    Much has been written of late of the pressures of the rabbinate, but none hold a candle to this one: the most natural thing to be shared between spouses is work frustrations, yet, for a Rav this must not happen.

    We see the idea of confidentiality in many of the events in Sefer Bereishis.

    Sarah, so shocked at the suggestion of a future child, laughed. But was not Avraham, at the end of Lech Lcha, already informed about this joyous future event? Would he not have told Sarah already?

    According to the meforshim who explain that Yitzchak was ignorant to Eisav’s evil ways: was not Rivka told through a navi at the beginning of the parsha regarding the true nature of her sons? Indeed, that is how she knew to make sure the Yaakov receive the berachos! Why then did she leave Yitzchak in the dark?

    The Ramban (18:15 and 27:4) asks these questions. It is beyond this column to go into the reasons that the Ramban offers (see also Netziv as it relates to Rivka), but it suffices for us to make the following remarks: how easily could have Rivka vindicated herself and her subterfuge-like actions! How delighted would have Avraham been to be the one to reveal to Sarah –as soon as he heard –that her dream of bearing a child would soon come true! But, for whatever holy reason, they had to keep quiet and leave their respective spouses in the dark.

    What a nisayon!

    Many years ago, Rebbitzen Pam z’l was sitting by a wedding when some ladies asked her how she was managing with all that was “going on” in Torah V’Daas during a famously, and public, trying period. Bewildered, Rebbetzin Pam looked at them and said sincerely, “What is going on in the yeshiva?” The whole world was talking about it at their kitchen tables, but Rav Pam – who worked there! – knew to keep quiet, and his wife may have been the one person left who was oblivious to the shameful talking. So, this column shall continue, the best stories concealed, and proper order preserved.

  • Keys, Kiddush and Memories

    To everyone on the outside, someone else’s job almost always seems like a mystery.

    “What do they do all day”, “How does it work”, etc. are common questions we think but dare not ask.

    Perhaps this is why certain professions, like doctors, teachers, lawyers and accountants –aside for the obvious reasons, always garner respect. We know how theyspend their day, we have their job figured out.

    My oldest and youngest daughter were heard talking on the way home from shul last Shabbos.

    “So, Hadassah, you know we are moving soon, right?”

    “Of course I know that!” replied the five year old.

    Wondering how far she has thought this move through, she proceeded to ask her younger sister about the move, and in particular, why another shul wants me to be their rabbi.

    The five year-old looked up and said, “Everyone knows why! Because they need someone to make kiddush after davening”!

    There it is; my job distilled down to allowing people to begin to eat!

    But the truth of the matter is that she touched upon something very real. There is no job description for a rav and indeed there may be some people (hopefully just a few) who only want to encounter the rav when its time for him to make kiddush.

    Others are looking for a posek. Still others are looking for an entertainer, or a master sermonizer. Others may be inspired by someone who is down to earth – in fact, recently a ben Torah told me, in all sincerity, that a rav who does not follow sports can’t be a rav in America! Yet others are looking for dry academics, someone who can get into the minutia of Tanach, dikduk and Jewish history. The list continues: the counselor, the writer, the peacemaker, and yes, the kiddush-maker.

    Over the next few months I will discuss, on and off, the job of rabbanus proper. In particular, we will discuss the probah process, and how a shul and a rav choose, and how one approaches a shul that is new for the rav but is already home to its balla battim. This is both because – after my announcement Pesach time in these pages that I would be leaving my current position for another – it was requested by a few that we delve into in to this ‘secretive’ subject, and, because there is little else on my mind these days other than rabbanus, my choices, challenges and changes.

    Asked once if was ever nostalgic for his youth, Yogi Berra is said to have replied with a sigh. “Ah, Nostalgia…”, now looking into the distance, “…it ain’t what it used to be”

    Sometime our past confronts us, forcing its way onto our hearts and minds, demanding that we pay it heed.

    I am told that I am ‘moving on’ –a term that is a misnomer if there ever was one, as one never moves on from a place that retains a piece of one’s heart and soul.

    As I begin to pack up my sefarim I can’t help but feel nostalgic, wistful.

    Each sefer I grab reminds me of a shailah, a shiur or a drasha for which I mined its contents.

    `

    As I clean out my shul office drawer I find old letters and notes. The family picture that once stood on my desk of a young married couple and their, then, one daughter. The correspondence sent from a prisoner who was slowly becoming frum with the help of his weekly Ami. The note left on my desk from a visitor who questioned a psak I once made during davening and had told me he would ask his own rav upon his return to Israel- he did, his rav to my surprise was Rav Shmuel Vosner zt’l, and he, thankfully, concurred (his exact words were, “For Buffalo it was correct”). The letter I received from a member who was deeply hurt, understandably and regrettably, by something I had mentioned in a drasha; the note left on the door of the shul one day last year from a member of the New York State Highway Dept. letting us know that they accidently knocked down a lechi of our eruv, explaining further that they were fearful of fixing it themselves out of concern of making an error (amazing!!); the phone message note from a women who called one erev Rosh Hashanah just to let me know that she was visited by Elijah the night before and that she would be appointed as moshiach in a month or so (she still calls the office every several weeks).

    My mind raced back in time twelve years, just a few weeks before I moved here. I was walking through the aisles of ShopRite on Highway 9 in Lakewood when I bumped into an old friend I had learnt with in Rav Dovid Soleveitchik. When I mentioned I would be moving, and to Buffalo of all places, he told me the following story about Rav Mordechai Weinberg, rosh yeshivah of Yeshiva Gedoleh of Montreal, and my father in law’s rebbe. I have never verified this story, but its lesson is spot-on and has never left me.

    As a yungerman in Yeshivas Rabbeinu Chaim Berlin, Rav Weinberg was known as one of the premier yungeleit. He had a gift of dealing with younger bochurim and talking to them in learning. One day he is called into Rav Hutner’s office. The rosh yeshiva explains that his excelling has not gone unnoticed and that, as all excepted, they want to give him a position in the yeshivah.

    At that, Rav Hutner reached into his drawer and pulled out a key to the dorms. “Here” he said as he handed Rav Weinberg the key “I want you to be the dorm counselor”.

    Mystified, Rav Weinberg took the key. Rav Hutner noticed Rav Weinberg’s surprise, and understood that he was likely expecting a more ‘prestigious’ position in the yeshiva like shoel umeishiv or even giving a shiur of some kind.

    Rav Hutner held the key in Rav Weinberg’s hand and said, “I am giving you a shlissel (key)! With this shlissel you can just be a dorm counselor or use it to begin something special. Only you can decide which door to open with it. A shlissel is a powerful thing”

    There in the cereal section of the Lakewood ShopRight my friend concluded that Rav Weinberg used his shlissel to perfect his methods of dealing with young men, eventually opening up his own yeshiva in Montreal.

    This is an invaluable lesson. As with any occupation or performance we can either be a seat-filler, a paycheck receiver, or a man with a shlissel that can open any and all doors. While I certainly have regrets, projects not yet finished or never started, this story has often galvanized me throughout my tenure, and I hope its lesson will never fade as I embark on a new journey.

  • Vaccines: A Selection of Its Halachic History

    Vaccines: A Selection of Its Halachic History

    May, 2015

    For A More In-Depth Discussion, As Well As For The Full History Behind Each Of The People The Tiferess Yisroel Mentions, See My Handouts On This Topic, Go To: https://www.sefaria.org/sheets/177158?lang=bi

    With the recent outbreak of measles (last year there were about 400 deaths per day), the subject and controversy surrounding vaccinations, while never quite dormant, once again resurfaced into the mainstream.

    Potential contenders for the 2016 presidential race are being asked their views on the matter, and rabbanim are being asked by schools what, if anything, they need to or must do.

    In this week’s column I will go through some of the halacha and history relating to vaccines. While a short column cannot do justice to this important subject, I hope it will at the very least serve to whet the readers’ appetitive and encourage the reader to research the matter in greater detail by perusing the source material provided at the end of this column.

    I am keenly aware that many are quite passionate about this subject. Let me state that I am not a doctor. While I made the choice to vaccinate all my children right away, this column is simply to give a brief overview of some of the halachic matters this subject touches upon.

    The debate regarding immunization and vaccines go back hundreds of years. One of the founding fathers of the United States, Benjamin Franklin, writing in his autobiography states:

     “In 1736 I lost one of my sons, a fine boy of four years old, by the smallpox taken in the common way. I long regretted bitterly and still regret that I had not given it to him by inoculation. This I mention for the sake of the parents who omit that operation, on the supposition that they should never forgive themselves if a child died under it; my example showing that the regret may be the same either way, and that, therefore, the safer should be chosen.”

    About eight years before the death of Mr. Franklin, in the city of Hazdeutsch, Rav Yisroel Lipshutz, was born. He would become the great Rav of Danzig (d.1861) but would be most famous for his magnum opus, the Tiferess Yisroel commentary to all of mishanyos. Virtually every Jewish home owns at least one set of mishnayos that contains this masterful work.

    Aside from his commentary to the mishnayos themselves, this work is also celebrated for its careful and encyclopedic reviews and introductions to a number of complicated halachic themes and topics. As well, Rav Lipshitz would often give us a glimpse into matters pertaining to the science and medicine of his day. From the discovery of dinosaurs, the age of the universe and the dateline, the Tiferess Yisroel was unique in the subjects he tackled.

    One of his most fascinating tangents of his is to be found to his commentary to Avos (chapter 3, first entry to Boaz). There he discusses the difference, in his view, between Jew and Gentile. Being that chazal make clear that, unlike other systems of faith, we believe that one need not be a member of our nation to enter olam habah (Sanhedrin 105, Rambam Hil. Melachim ch.8), he seeks to understand why, then, chazal in other places seem to describe Jews, and Jews alone, in certain positive categories.

    Before he goes on to offer a beautiful explanation, and further theorize as to how indeed we are to view wonderful and law-abiding gentiles, he lists for us the many gentiles to whom we owe so much, sometimes even our lives, and how unfortunate it would be if we have a misguided sense of their standing in this world and the next.

    Two examples he brings that stick out are Gutenberg, of the Gutenberg Press, without whom so much Torah could have been lost, and Edward Jenner, the creator of the first modernized Smallpox vaccine through which “tens upon tens of thousands were saved”.

    I would even surmise that many of us would not be here reading this if not for Jenner’s vaccine.

    The one ‘error’ here is that it was not ‘tens upon tens of thousands’ who were saved, rather, until this inoculation was created and used close to a half-a-million Europeans in the 18th century alone died due to Smallpox. In the first half of the 20th, due to many not having access to the vaccine, it had wiped out not a half-a-million people, but close to a half-billion people!

    By the late 1970’s the World Health Organization was able to announce that the disease had been eradicated.

    This was an amazing feat, considering the blight that had always been Smallpox – why, even one of the early Pharaohs (Ramses V, whose tomb was discovered about 100 years ago) was found to have traces of smallpox!

    Although Smallpox no longer poses a threat in the classic sense, it is still a threat in warfare, and indeed the Israeli army immunized tens of thousands of its members in case, R’l, such a chemical attack take place.

    Then as now there are risks related to vaccines. Flu vaccines carry a one or two in two million Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) risk. Some vaccines carry risk of allergic reaction. The measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, popularly known as MMR, has long been anecdotally tied to autism (the medical world, wit large strongly dismisses this last assertion).

    Would halacha still sanction such inoculations?

    For example, while the Salk polio vaccine carries no risk of contacting polio, it does not protect from giving small trace amounts to others; the Sabin polio vaccine however protects others as well, but indeed carries a small risk of infection in the one being immunized (about one in two million).

    May one take such a risk?

    Once again, we turn to the Tiferess Yisroel. In his commentary to Yoma (8:3 Boaz 3) that regarding ‘inoculation’ (a word he transliterates into Hebrew) where there is a one in one thousand chance of even death, it would be permitted as the risk of an outbreak is even worse.

    While Rav Neurwirth did not feel that this was enough to obligate parents to inoculate their children (although it was certainly cause to urge them), Rav Elyashiv, at least regarding certain vaccinations, seemed to feel that parents have an obligation to do so (quoted by Rabbi Akiva Tatz in his Dangerous Diseases, Dangerous Therapies, p. 48 ff).

    It is questionable if one can ever ignore a government law requiring vaccinations, as indicating by the last line in a published letter from a beis din in Lakewood to a school principle on this topic, and from shu’t Tzitz Eliezar 15:40.

    Yet, many states have allowed an out through a religious exemption.

    I have heard some claim that the rule of shomer pesaim Hashem Hashem guards the simpletons’ -which teaches that certain accepted practices, even if they carry some risk, are allowed – should allow them to take on the risk of not inoculating their children.

    This, in my view, is a specious argument.

    For, even if they are correctly applying this rule (which alone seems fallacious as it pertains to vaccines, not to mention that it also puts others at risk) this does not mean that they must avoid it! For example, it is one thing to suggest that shomer pesaim allows one to smoke cigarettes, but quite another to assert that this rule, and ergo their religion, tells them that they must smoke!

    In other words, even assuming their application of this rule is correct, it does not seem to fall under a religious exemption, in the sense that their religion demands that they refrain.

    Further, if they are asking the state to go against their values (the state’s) because of their (the parents’) understanding of the Torah, then might I ask these parents to do the same? Challenge your own beliefs by reading the copious Torah halachic material on the subject, found listed below.

    The greatest non-medical inoculation against disease, the most profound health security, is to surrender to an objective Torah view, no matter which side one stands on.

    (I have only included the below the English articles on this subject, so that all the readers could have access to them)

    1 – ‘Compelled to Inoculate: May Parents Refuse Vaccinations for Their Children?’ By: Rabbi Aaron E. Glatt, Dr. Fred Rosner, Rabbi Yitzchok Breitowitz, and Rabbi Zev Schostak

    RJJ Journal of Contemporary Halacha

    2 – ‘Vaacination In Jewish Law’ By: Rabbi Alfred Cohen

    RJJ Journal of Contemporary Halacha

    3 – ‘Vaccination in Halakhah and in Practice in the Orthodox Jewish Community’ By: Rabbi Asher Bush

    Hakira: The Flatbush Journal of Jewish Law and Thought

    ‘Halachic Attitudes Toward Immunization’ By: Rabbi Yigal Shafran

    Tradition Journal

    4 –’Dangerous Disease and Dangerous Therapy in Jewish Medical Ethics: Principles and Practice’ By: Rabbi Dr. Akiva Tatz

    Targum Press

    5 –‘Vaccines In Halacha’ By: Rabbi Tzvi Hirch Haber

    TorahLab

    6 – ‘Halachic Aspects of Vaccinations’ By: Dr. Edward Reichman

     Jewish Action

    7 – ‘Vaccinations: An Exploration of their History, Development, and Halachic Ramifications’ By: Deborah Zharnest Journal of Torah and Science

  • Kashrus, Rabbanus and Hasagas Gvul

    Part 1

    A story to introduce a story:

    A man once came to the Chazon Ish asking if he could rely on a certain rav’s hechsher.

     “I asked the rav if his hechsher is reliable and he responded by telling me that it is, however the less people who eat from it the more comfortable he feels”.

    The Chazon Ish responded that if indeed this rav feels such a heavy weight of responsibility to the point of not just being unoffended if one does not eat from him, but even feeling a sense of relief, then that is surely a sign that he could be trusted.

    I can relate to that rav.

    I do not enjoy the achroyos of being accountable for what is deemed ‘kosher’ in Buffalo. For this reason I have never been able to understand those who seem to have not only lost no sleep due to their already heavy responsibilities, but seek more of it…in other cities than their own, cities who have their own already well-established rabbanim.

     Who wants more achriyos? Who is willing to fight for it? The idea of rabbis, but mostly scholarly balla battim, from other cities entering towns and making halachik decisions is unprecedented in Jewish history.

    I am not talking about a factory that serves a national or international customer base, rather commissaries that serve primarily that particular city. Indeed, there are times that my vaad have called upon a major hechsher to take over a company for us. Large companies serve an international customer base, and are a therefore different discussion.

    The issues to which I am referring goes well beyond kashrus.

    Now for my story:

    My first year in Buffalo, I received a call from the Buffalo Bills, the local NFL franchise. They wanted to offer their fans a kosher option at the games, and were wondering if the vaad would be able to certify a hot-dog stand.

    I told them that it is certainly possible, although difficult, and certain rules would have to be set into place (like having a mashgiach temidi).

    They then put me in touch with one of the vendors. As we began the meeting I informed him of how we would go about either purchasing a new grill or koshering an old one. He then said something startling. “Oh, we are already kosher, we just now want to go under the vaad”.

    I responded, “Well, yes, you may be ‘kosher’ in your eyes, but in order to become certified…”

    “No, no”, he cut me off, “We are certified. We are simply switching kashrus agencies”.

    May I remind the reader that this conversation was taking place in Buffalo, NY. Apparently a small-medium size vaad 2500 miles away was offering certification to a hot-dog stand in Ralph Wilson Stadium in Orchard Park, NY!

    My first reaction was not, “How dare they come to ‘our’ turf…” but rather, “Who could be their mashgiach temidi?”

    The reader must keep in mind that certifying a kosher hot-dog stand during a NFL game is a great risk. A proprietor of such a commissary can never know how many hot-dogs to bring or how many costumers will patronize them on any given game-day. So that the fear of quickly re-filling your hot-dogs with those from one of the hundreds of carts within walking distance (as opposed to going to the one kosher deli in town, who likely would not have the number of hot-dogs needed anyway) is great and obvious.

    Upon returning to my office I called, long-distance, this vaad. They were at first taken aback that I was asking for information about this stand in Buffalo, unsure if they should share it.

    Can we imaging 100 years ago, balla battim, or members of klei kodesh, not community rabbanim themselves nor even chosen by local rabbanim, getting involved in other cities’ religious business –to begin with – and then having the temerity to wonder if the rav in that very city is out of bounds for simply wanting to be informed as to what his town is putting in their mouths!? (I am secretly hoping that someone writes in a defense of these tactics)

    I repeat that I am speaking of commissaries that serve primarily the bnei ha’ir, and not national companies.

    He finally gave me the name of their mashgiach temidi –a man I knew. I called him up and asked him if it is true, that he is working for this agency stationed 2500 miles away. He laughed, and explained he was paid one time to go and look at the grill before the football season stared. That was the extent of their supervision according to him.

    This all represents a new American reality. For the first time in Jewish history, ballabattim and non-sitting rabbanim have taken it upon themselves to involve themselves in religious questions that effect cities far, far away.

    Rav Moshe Feinstein was once asked about this (Choshen Mishpat vol. 2 siman 39). He responded to the Vaad HaRabanim of Pittsburgh with the following:

    Relating to the Kashrus in the city of Pittsburgh, it is clear and obvious that it should be under your authority (Rabbi Wolf Leiter) and the other members of the local rabbinate, as it has been until now…. whether due to the fact that you earned the right for the mitzvah, or the fact that the public already entrusted you with this job, or the money issues involved. There is therefore no right for anyone to come and mix into the cities kashrus without your (the vaad’s) permission, even if this individual is a kashrus expert himself…and it is forbidden for anyone (in the city) to rely on this (other) kashrus.”

    What is so sad about the above letter is that it was the rabbanei ha’ir who wrote Rav Moshe asking him his opinion, not the nameless out-of-town rav; that the burden of proof is now on local rabbanim and not the nameless others is the greatest tragedy of it all. The fact that I feel I need to even write this column –and next week I will explain what brought this subject to light – is a tragedy, and a reconstruction of 3000 years of history.

    Rav Akiva Eiger and the Nesivos were once walking in a park when they passed by two frum teenagers playing chess. The Nesivos turned to Rav Akiva Eiger and said, “Moshiach must be coming! For chazal (Sota 49) teach that before Moshiach comes chutzpah yasgi (chutzpah will increase), and these boys refused to stand for two elderly rabbanim!”

    Rav Akiva Eiger is purported to have replied, “That is not what chazal meant when they said there will be an increase of chutzpah before Moshiach’s arrival. Rather, this is: you and I will be sitting on a park bench when these two kids will walk by. One will say to the other, “Moshiach must be coming because Rav Eiger and the Nesivos didn’t stand for me”!

    We have now entered this upside down world (see Pesachim 50).

     I once informed a guest in shul that what he was doing publicly during davening was not our minhag and was upsetting people, and if he could do it quietly or not at all. He looked at me and shook his head ‘No’. I explained that even in the NFL there is a need for referees so that the main players can have a good game.

    I will not forget his shocked response. With a stunned look on his face he replied, “Are you actually comparing your job to that of an NFL referee?!” He then turned and continued his actions.

    To him the chutzpah was that I thought a rav in his own beis haknesses was as important as a referee in a game, that I would dare compare a rav to a far, far more important occupation, a far more necessary role! Now, on the other hand, should someone call a rav and ask to take over his job, to move there in his stead so that they can then be made aware of all the issues in that city, that would at least make sense. But no one would dare do that, for that would be such a chutzpah…and, anyway, moving is so hard…